Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bowman v. Sawyer, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
J.E. KRUEGER, Regional Director, North Central Regional Office F.B.O.P., BRAD GRELICK, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Englewood, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Interim Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH F. BOWMAN
Scott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv01075
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, F.B.O.P Inmate Lock Box and F.D.C. Englewood Colo.
Plaintiff:
Marino B. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Fox, et al
as 17-1090
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK FOX, F.B.O.P. and D.S.C.C.
Brown v. Fox et al
as 1:2016cv03189
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
Jack Fox, F.B.O.P. and D.S.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKern v. Upton et al
as 1:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
Stacey Ella McKern
Defendant:
Jody R. Upton, U.S. Department of Justice and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Burgess v. Daniels, et al
as 13-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, PAUL M. LAIRD, CHARLES E. SAMUELS and others
Burgess v. Daniels et al
as 1:2013cv02191
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
Charles A. Daniels, Charles (I) A. Daniels, Charles E. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rummel v. Garcia
as 12-1138
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY ALLEN RUMMEL
Respondent - Appellee:
RENE GARCIA, Warden-FPC-Englewood-F.B.O.P.
Johnson, Jr. v. Lappin, et al
as 11-1381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVELAND JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons (F.B.O.P.), MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director, F.B.O.P., HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmates Appeals, F.B.O.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
