Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust v. Montero
as 23-5045
Plaintiff / Appellee: TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK R. MONTERO
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust, et al
as 23-5039
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANK R. MONTERO
Defendant / Appellee: TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST, AKA T.A.I.T., CITY OF TULSA and JUDGE TAMMY BRUCE
T.A.I.T. v. Montero
as 4:2023cv00143
Plaintiff: T.A.I.T.
Defendant: Frank R Montero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff: Frank R Montero
Defendant: Tulsa Airport Improvement Trust, City of Tulsa, Tammy Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00260
Plaintiff: Frank R Jones
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Morrell v. Martinez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00800
Respondent: Department of Corrections, FNU Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner: Frank R. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dickman v. US Bancorp et al
as 1:2018cv00164
Plaintiff: Frank Karl Dickman, Jr.
Defendant: US Bancorp, Richard Davis, Andrew Cecede and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montero v. Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00622
Plaintiff: Frank R Montero
Defendant: Tulsa Airport Improvements Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roudybush v. Duncan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv01374
Plaintiff: John Roudybush
Defendant: Randy Duncan, John Calven Price, James Gile and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00435
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?