Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cobb v. Tinker Federal Credit Union, et al
as 21-6024
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY S. LUDLAM, individually, JOEL C. HALL, individually, RANDY G. GORDON, individually and others
Defendant:
TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Federally Chartered Credit Union Service Organization
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GALAN D. COBB, an individual
Cobb v. Tinker Federal Credit Union, et al
as 21-6020
Defendant / Appellee:
MULINIX OGDEN HALL ANDREWS AND LUDLAM PLLC, an Oklahoma professional limited liability company, HALL AND LUDLAM PLLC, an Oklahoma professional limited liability company, TINKER FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Federally Chartered Credit Union Service Organization and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GALAN D. COBB, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 20-3007
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
In re: Loggins
as 19-3182
Respondent:
STEPHEN D. HILL, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, DAVID M. UNRUH, Sedgwick County Commissioner, JEFF EASTER, Sedgwick County Sheriff and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 19-3065
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Loggins (ID 63088) v. Pilshaw et al
as 5:2018cv03254
Defendant:
Richard Ranzau, Thomas Malone, J. Patrick Walter and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Loggins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Gordon et al
as 1:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Albert Lopez
Defendant:
John G Gordon and Valencia County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
