Cases 1 - 10 of 11
F.S. v. Captify Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01142
Defendant:
F.S., individuallly an on behalf of all other similarly situated, Advent Health Services, LLC d/b/a Adventhealth Shawnee Mission, Captify Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
F.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Endicott-Quinones et al v. Garza et al
as 1:2020cv01350
Plaintiff:
E. B., A. D., Laura K Castillo and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-50, Patricia Garza and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Doe
as 1:2018cv01159
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ray Nelson
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, et al v. United States, et al
as 16-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS LEON SMITH and BRUCE CLYDE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Kling (ID 98624) v. Cline et al
as 5:2014cv03051
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Kling
Defendant:
Sam Cline, (fnu) Nichols and John/Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Arguello, et al
as 10-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, BOBBY R. BALDOCK and others
Young v. Eskestrand, et al
as 10-1070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GENE YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. ESKESTRAND, M.D., ORVILLE NEUFELD, M.D., PHD., DO., R. LINDSEY LILLY, JR., M.D. and others
Hawks v. Mattox, et al
as 09-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN L. HAWKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM MATTOX, DAN MORALES, JOHN CORNYN and others
v. Mattox, et al.,
as 2:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Hawks
Defendant:
Dan Morales, John Cornyn, Gregg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sneller v. United States, et al
as 08-1221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA SNELLER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
