Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Amaro v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 21-2039
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY ROARK, Director of Adult Prisons, JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Trujillo v. Williams, et al
as 19-2031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JESSE TRUJILLO
Defendant / Appellant:
JOE WILLIAMS, Corrections Secretary, New Mexico Correctional Department and ELMER BUSTOS, Director New Mexico Dept. of Corrections
Amaro v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Amaro
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Susana Martinez, Bill Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Skidgel
as 14-2061
Petitioner:
CLIFTON SKIDGEL
Respondent:
JOE WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Trujillo v. Williams
as 1:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jesse Trujillo
Defendant:
Joe Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinzo v. State of N.M. Dept. of Corr., et al
as 13-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES HINZO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE TAPIA, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Anaya v. State of New Mexico, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Vicente Anaya
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Department of Corrections, Joe Williams, Erasmo Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 11-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVON LYMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, JOSEPH NEUBAUER and CHARLIE CARRIZALES
Defendant:
WEXFORD CORP, JOHN SANCHEZ, ABNER HERNANDEZ and others
Trujillo v. Williams, et al
as 11-2177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE TRUJILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE WILLIAMS, Secretary and ELMER BUSTOS, Director New Mexico Dept. of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
