Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Topeka, Kansas, City of v. Crafco, Inc.
as 5:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
City of Topeka and Topeka, Kansas, City of
Defendant:
Crafco, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
KM International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Doe 1 et al v. United States Olympic Committee
as 1:2019cv00902
Defendant:
Angela M. Ruggiero, Ursula M. Burns, John S. Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Jane ALC Doe 29, Jane KRA Doe 32, Jane KM Doe 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
John Doe KM v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02256
Defendant:
United States of America and Mark E. Wisner
Plaintiff:
John Doe KM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Matthews, et al v. Bergdorf, et al
as 16-5168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL MATTHEWS and CHRISTY WRIGHT, as next friend and appointed guardian of JM, KM, CM, EM, SP, AP, NP, GM, and MS
Defendant - Appellant:
KILA BERGDORF, RONALD MOON, VINNIE HARMON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, WILKIE SANDERS, JERRY MATTHEWS and others
Matthews, et al v. Bergdorf, et al
as 16-5139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL MATTHEWS and CHRISTY WRIGHT, as next friend and appointed guardian of JM, KM, CM, EM, SP, AP, NP GM, and MS;
Defendant - Appellant:
KILA BERGDORF, RONALD MOON, VINNIE HARMON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, WIKIE SANDERS, JERRY MATTHEWS and others
RS-ANB Fund v. KMS SPE et al
as 2:2012mc00487
Plaintiff:
RS-ANB Fund
Defendant:
KMS SPE , Liz Air 6 , Jerald M. Spilsbury and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Insurance Company of the West v. Mateosky et al
as 2:2011cv00276
Plaintiff:
Insurance Company of the West
Defendant:
Kasey Mateosky, Leanne Mateosky and KM Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
