Cases 1 - 10 of 2,636
Conrady v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03078
Petitioner:
Wyatt A. Conrady
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner:
KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Walking Eagle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Kevin Walking Eagle
Respondent:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzaelz v. Brunnemer, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL TREVIZO GONZAELZ
Defendant:
KODY BRUNNEMER, in his individual and official capacity, KEVIN DOUGLAS, in his individual and official capacity and CITY OF GREELEY, COLORADO
Castor (PS) v. Flesch et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Castor
Defendant:
Kevin Flesch, Debra DeRee, Titus Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward v. McIntosh County, et al.
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al.,, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Payne
as 24-3065
Petitioner:
SEAN J. DILLON
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
