Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Children's Hospital Colorado v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2023cv02561
Plaintiff:
Children's Hospital Colorado
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin III, in his capacity as Secretary of Defense and Lloyd Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez (PS) v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kalma Harris, A Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Taurus v. Austin
as 21-1305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILAGRO TAURUS
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD AUSTIN, III, Secretary, Department of Defense
Robert et al v. Austin et al
as 1:2021cv02228
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert and Hollie Mulvihill
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Xavier Becerra and Janet Woodcock
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1107 Armed Forces: Use Of Investigational New Drug
Taurus v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2021cv01140
Plaintiff:
Milagro Taurus
Defendant:
Department of Defense and Lloyd Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
