Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Harris (PS) et al v. Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Malik Shakur Harris, Najee Hoffman, Nazeem Shabazz and others
Defendant:
Aurora Fire Department, Falck Rocky Mountain and Aurora Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 wd - Fed.Question: Wrongful Death
Hough v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03077
Defendant:
(fnu) Cunningham, (fnu) Alatary, Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Hough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Knowells (PS) et al v Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver and Tina Knowells
Defendant:
Jhon Jackson, Mr. Mike Lee, Malik Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Restaurant Depot
as 2:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Smith, Jr. and Malik Rahman
Defendant:
Restaurant Depot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Malik S. Harris
Defendant:
Kayla Sue Lee, ICCS, Josey Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reverse My Fees, LLC v. True POS Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Plaintiff:
Reverse My Fees, LLC
Defendant:
Ephantus Githinji Mwangi, Five Star Processing, Inc., Malik S Iqbal and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harris v. ICCS et al
as 1:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
Malik Shakur Harris
Defendant:
ICCS, Kayla Lee, Josey Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malik v. Gerlach
as 5:2022cv00865
Petitioner:
Nohmaan Riaz Malik
Respondent:
Jim Gerlach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mason v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00800
Petitioner:
Malik Mason
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
