Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01377
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 5:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Alaska, State of, Utah, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Barrales v. Garland
as 24-9529
Petitioner:
CASIMIRO ROMERO BARRALES
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Director, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Stanley DeWilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
