Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gabler v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Paul E Gabler, II
Respondent:
United States of America, General Merrick Garland, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ProCraft Masonry, LLC v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
ProCraft Masonry, LLC
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Webster et al v. Durbin et al
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Shirley Dione Webster, Paul Leroy Wickham and Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Dick Durbin, John Roberts, Anita M Josey-Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rywelski v. Biden et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marion Rywelski
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, U.S. Department of Justice, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
