Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Brauning v. Christian, et al
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GILBERT CHRISTIAN, individual and Sheriff of Pontotoc County, CHARLES STEVEN KESSINGER, individual and District Judge of Pontotoc County, LORI LYNN JACKSON, individual and Associate District Judge and others
Brundage v. Vandam et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gary Earl Brundage
Defendant:
Michael Lee Vandam, Ogden LDS Family Services and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Cobb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Crow
as 22-7007
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, DOR Director
Gramm v. Speedy's LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gramm
Defendant:
Speedy's LLC and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Willis v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Willis
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murrel v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Murrel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Utah
as 1:2021cv00071
Respondent:
State of Utah
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Crow et al
as 6:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
