Cases 1 - 10 of 2,315
Miller v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv01695
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. and Jordan Kozar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Bivings (PS) v. Arapahoe Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Kayla S. Bivings
Defendant:
Arapahoe Department of Human Services, Darlene Locke and Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lakey, et al v. Miller, et al
as 24-7055
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LAKEY and DOUGLAS LAKEY, as co-Special Administrators for the Estate of Jared Lakey
Defendant:
TERRY MILLER, in his individual capacity, DAVID DUGGAN, in his individual capacity, JOSHUA TAYLOR and others
Lakey, et al v. Duggan, et al
as 24-7053
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LAKEY and DOUGLAS LAKEY, as co-Special Administrators for the Estate of Jared Lakey
Defendant:
DAVID DUGGAN, in his individual capacity, JOSHUA TAYLOR, BRANDON DINGMAN, in his individual capacity and others
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2024cv01592
Plaintiff:
Antonio Miller and Penthouse Enterprise, LLC
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
Miller v. Hemken
as 5:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Defendant:
Chianna Hemken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Miller
as 24-7046
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FLOYD PRESTON MILLER, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
