Cases 1 - 10 of 10
King v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Kevin Caroll, Michelle Abraham, Erlinda Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Eric King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson et al v. Madison et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Erwin Villatoro
Defendant:
Richard Madison, Patricia Rangel, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, John Rathman, Blake Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 10-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L WEINSHIENK, ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, LEWIS T. BABCOCK and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Daniel, et al
as 09-1552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILEY Y. DANIEL, LEWIS T. BABCOCK, ZITA L WEINSHIENK and others
Akers v. Daniel et al
as 1:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Wiley Y. Daniel, Lewis T. Babcock, Zita L. Weinshienk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 08-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2008cv02572
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Boyd N. Boland, Robert M. Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
