Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schell v. Gurich, et al
as 20-6044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. FIELDS, member, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors, JUSTICE JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Associate Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, JOHN MORRIS WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Oklahoma Bar Association and Secretary/Treasurer, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. SCHELL
Schell v. Williams
as 5:2019cv00281
Defendant:
John Morris Williams
Plaintiff:
Mark E Schell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bednar et al v. Hesse et al
as 5:2019cv00279
Plaintiff:
M.F.B. and Alexander Bednar
Defendant:
John Morris Williams, Paul Hesse, Renee Troxel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kerchee, et al v. Smith, et al
as 12-6080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN KERCHEE, JR. and DEBORAH SEQUICHIE-KERCHEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SMITH, Judge Comanche CO, WILLIAM C. RILEY, Comanche CO ADA, EMMIT TAYLOE, Attorney and others
Kerchee et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2011cv00459
Defendant:
Nona Cutnose, Mark Smith, William C Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Kerchee, Jr and Deborah Sequichie-Kerchee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Werholtz, et al
as 10-3302
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ and STEVE SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Williams v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2009cv03097
Petitioner:
Morris Williams
Respondent:
Roger Werholtz and Steve Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Texaco Star Mart et al
as 5:2007cv03181
Plaintiff:
Morris Williams
Defendant:
Texaco Star Mart, Dewayne Ingold, Thomas Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
