Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court, et al
as 24-2174
Defendant:
SUSAN ROSSIGNOL, JASON JONES, MERCEDES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPRINGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunklee v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Child Support ent. Dev., Keith M. Valles, Socorro Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Dunklee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court, et al
as 24-2087
Defendant:
SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SUSAN ROSSIGNOL, MERCEDES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPRINGER
Murdock et al v. Maverick Turtle Creek Apartments et al
as 2:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
Edward Murdock and Sheryl Murdock
Defendant:
Maverick Turtle Creek Apartments, Charles LNU, Melody Condor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court, et al
as 23-2158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MERCEDES MURPHY, SHANNON MURDOCK-POFF and others
Springer v. Seventh Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Springer
Defendant:
Seventh Judicial District Court, Mercedes Murphy, Shannon Murdock-Poff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murdock et al v. Maverick Turtle Creek Apartments et al
as 2:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Edward Murdock and Sheryl Murdock
Defendant:
Maverick Turtle Creek Apartments, Melody Condor, Charles LNU and others
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
