Cases 1 - 10 of 1,648
Ryan v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Seth Osborn, Progress Review Panel, Kansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Ryan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv02456
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Kunzweiler
as 4:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler
Plaintiff:
Ryan K Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sample (PS) v. Shea Apex Merdian East et al
as 1:2024cv02393
Defendant:
Shea Apex Merdian East, Mark N. Tschetter and Apex Merdian II LLC
Plaintiff:
Luke Ryan Sample
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pester v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ryan L Pester
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walz v. Central Bank of Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00618
Defendant:
Central Bank of Utah, Ryan C. Staker, Cohne Kinghorn and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Robert Walz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walz v. Ekins et al
as 2:2024cv00612
Defendant:
Matthew D. Ekins, Gallian Welker and Associates, Tiama Investments and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Robert Walz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Neeley (PS) v. Long et al
as 1:2024cv02283
Petitioner:
Suzanna Neeley
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of: Colorado, The and Ryan Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00385
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Ryan Walters
Plaintiff:
Joseph Loren Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
