Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Ross (PS) v. Arapahoe Detention Facility
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ross
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Arapahoe Detention Facility and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schindlbeck v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Schindlbeck
Defendant:
Tyler S. Brown and Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00862
Petitioner:
Christopher Dickens
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irvin v. Brown
as 1:2022cv03259
Petitioner:
Marquise A. Irvin
Respondent:
Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv02449
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Philip S. Brown, Amber L. Brown, Johnson County, Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Bovo v. Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Todd F. Bovo and Todd Frank Bovo
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Sheriff, Sheriff Tyler Brown, Kenneth Foley and others
Kilman v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02783
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Nathan B. Coats and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Brown
as 5:2021cv00956
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Gerald S Brown doing business as Upper Level Lounge The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irvin v. Brown
as 1:2021cv02254
Petitioner:
Marquise Antonio Irvin
Respondent:
No Named Respondents and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Chesley et al v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
James M. Chesley, Raul Gallegos, Ramon K. Nero and others
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Nathan B. Coats, Tyler S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
