Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Seehase (PS) et al v. Teske et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Diana Seehase and Dawn Watkins
Defendant:
Andrew H. Teske, John Pryzoda, Mark J. Jachimiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MRG (PS) v. Janski et al
as 1:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
MRG
Defendant:
Kathleen Marie Janski, Carol Patterson, Joshua Labo doing business as Patterson Transcription Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sorensen v. Roark et al
as 1:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Terry Sorensen
Defendant:
Jerry Roark, Maureen Sheridan, Robert Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towers v. Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of et al
as 5:2021cv04089
Plaintiff:
Celisha Towers
Defendant:
Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of, Michael Abbott, Canvassers, Board of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adebonojo v. Dorn et al
as 1:2021cv01715
Defendant:
Sandra Schramm, Andrea Kramer, Dean Williams and others
Plaintiff:
David Adebonojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Caley et al
as 1:2021cv01714
Petitioner:
Sixto Montanez
Defendant:
Eddie Caley, Kristy Stansell, A. Dugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devlin v. Wells et al
as 5:2021cv03083
Defendant:
Chris Wells, Renee (lnu), Gerry Nitcher and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Andrew Devlin, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
