Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Trejo Miranda v. Garland
as 24-9518
Petitioner:
JOEL TREJO MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Trejo-Chavez v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:21-cr-10013-JWB-2)
as 6:2023cv01065
Petitioner:
Mario Trejo-Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trejo v. Board of County Commissioners
as 1:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Jose Trejo
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Soto v. Trejo et al
as 1:2022cv00740
Plaintiff:
Salvador Soto
Defendant:
Ismael Trejo, Leasa Johnson, The Board of Stewards of Ruidoso Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ramirez et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Sierra County et al
as 2:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Alvin Ramirez and Shannon Ramirez
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Sierra County, New Mexico State Police, J. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chavez v. Butler County Detention Facility
as 5:2021cv03175
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Trejo Chavez
Defendant:
Butler County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gotovac, et al v. Trejo
as 20-2143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAD BOLEN and DEBRA GOTOVAC
Defendant / Appellee:
IZZY TREJO, Executive Director, New Mexico Racing Commission
Trejo v. USA
as 2:2020cv00851
Petitioner:
Roberto Trejo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
