Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kessler v. Schroetlin et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stephen Kessler
Defendant:
Brett Schroetlin, Aaron Glen Trainor and Grand County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Pontious
as 22-6032
Petitioner:
GLEN A, PONTIOUS
Respondent:
JAMES E. TRAINOR, III, WILLIAM BARR, NANCY PELOSI and others
Trainor v. Doe
as 1:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Shea Trainor
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pontious v. Trainor et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Glen A Pontious
Defendant:
Maxine Waters, James E Trainor, lll, Nancy Pelosi and others
Hatton v. Fountain Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv03570
Defendant:
Scott Trainor and Fountain Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline R. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trainor et al v. UBH et al
as 4:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Matilda Trainor, Melanie Trainor and Bernard Trainor
Defendant:
UBH doing business as Optum and United Healthcare Core
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 5:2015cv00844
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Burkhart v. Timme, et al
as 13-1040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE BURKHART
Defendant - Appellee:
RAE TIMME, Warden, In her official and individual capacity, ARTHUR TRAINOR, Case Manager, in his official and individual capacity, RON WAGER, Assistant Warden, in his official and personal capacity and others
Wyoming Glass Inc v. Trainor Glass Company Inc
as 1:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Glass Inc
Defendant:
Trainor Glass Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
