Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chavez v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
Joshua V. Chavez
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia v. Davis et al
as 1:2015cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jose V. Garcia
Defendant:
Clarence Davis, Lawrence Montano and Frank V. Chavez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Norris, et al
as 10-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN O. MAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. NORRIS, Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department, M. FREEMAN, Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department, R. WHITBY, Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department and others
Mays v. Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2009cv03127
Plaintiff:
Benjamin O. Mays
Defendant:
Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department, J. Norris, M. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Long Term Disability Income
as 09-2105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDUVIEJS V. CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME PLAN FOR CHOICES ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
Chavez vs. Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
as 6:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Eduvijes V Chavez and Eduvijes V Chavez
Defendant:
Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies, Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies and Long Term Disability Income Plan for Choices Eligible Employees of Johnson & Johnson and Affiliated Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Chavez vs. Johnson & Johnson
as 1:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Eduvijes V Chavez and Eduvijes V Chavez
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
