Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hwang v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Hwang
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Matthews, et al v. Bergdorf, et al
as 16-5168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL MATTHEWS and CHRISTY WRIGHT, as next friend and appointed guardian of JM, KM, CM, EM, SP, AP, NP, GM, and MS
Defendant - Appellant:
KILA BERGDORF, RONALD MOON, VINNIE HARMON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, WILKIE SANDERS, JERRY MATTHEWS and others
Matthews, et al v. Bergdorf, et al
as 16-5139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL MATTHEWS and CHRISTY WRIGHT, as next friend and appointed guardian of JM, KM, CM, EM, SP, AP, NP GM, and MS;
Defendant - Appellant:
KILA BERGDORF, RONALD MOON, VINNIE HARMON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the State of Oklahoma, WIKIE SANDERS, JERRY MATTHEWS and others
United States v. Archuleta
as 16-1297
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GABRIEL JESSE ARCHULETA, AKA Vinnie
Matthews et al v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2015cv00676
Plaintiff:
Rachel Matthews and Christy Wright
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The , Kila Bergdorf, Wilkie Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton-Timmons v. Thiel
as 6:2011cv01200
Plaintiff:
Vinnie Sutton-Timmons
Defendant:
Nathaniel Thiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riches v. Polizzi et al
as 1:2010cv02109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches doing business as Bernard Madoff also known as Faisal Shahzad and Faisal Shahzad
Defendant:
Nicole Polizzi other Snooki doing business as Jersey Shore, Paul Delvecchio, Mike Sorrentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
