Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Wood v. Dunn et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019cv00511
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, State of Alabama, Arnaldo Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd et al v. Buckner et al
as 2:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sandy Byrd , Jonathan Ponstein , Leeann Ponstein and others
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner , Kim Mashego , Kierra Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of Clanton, Alabama et al
as 2:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Carla Robinson
Defendant:
City of Clanton, Alabama, County of Chilton, Alabama , Darrell Bone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Whitman et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00780
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Lee Whitman, Dothan Utilities, Billy Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
