Cases 101 - 110 of 53,920
Craig v. Title Max of Alabama Inc
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markel Craig, Jr
Defendant:
Title Max of Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Marshall
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Edward Ray Dillard
Defendant:
Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Dake v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Allan Dake
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Sidney W Jackson, IV
Defendant:
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fluker v. Rollin' Wrench, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Steven Fluker
Defendant:
Rollin' Wrench, LLC and Reginald Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mashkevich v. Ava et al
as 4:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Mashkevich
Defendant:
Olivia Ava, Emma Miller and F.B. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Persons v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Tiffani Persons
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and RxBenefits Inc Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
