Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Stroupe v. Hogue et al
as 5:2016cv01690
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Stroupe
Defendant:
Carla Hogue, Lyons and Decatur City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturkie v. Lovvorn
as 1:2016cv01375
Plaintiff:
Carla Ann Sturkie
Defendant:
Anne Gertrude Lovvorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv01515
Petitioner:
Richard Morris Clark
Respondent:
Carla Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Tinney et al
as 2:2014cv02251
Plaintiff:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carla L Tinney , Jason Landers Love , John Hugh Love and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Guerrier v. The City of Decatur, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Reba Guerrier
Defendant:
The City of Decatur, Alabama, Billy Cook, Jessica Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leraaen et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 1:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
Myra Leraaen , Elvenia Blair , Nancy Tatum and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stallworth v. Graham et al
as 4:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Freddie James Stallworth
Defendant:
Carla Graham, Chad Cleveland and Carter Davenport
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Tinney et al
as 2:2013cv02328
Plaintiff:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carla L Tinney, Jason Landers Love, John Hugh Love and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv01725
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward Ball
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Carla Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burwell v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 2:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
Carla Canty Burwell
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
