Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Lowe v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
as 7:2011cv03239
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lowe
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County Jail, Ted Sexton, Eric Bailey and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Sexton
as 7:2011cv01237
Plaintiff:
Ruben Arcadio Ramirez
Defendant:
Edmund Ted Sexton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stuart et al
as 7:2010cv00592
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Lyn Stuart, Harold See, Champ Lyon, Jr and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eady v. Folks et al
as 7:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sidney Eady and Sidney Eady
Defendant:
Napoleon Folks, Ted Sexton, Ted Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haygood v. Bailey et al
as 7:2009cv01394
Plaintiff:
Roland Henry Haygood, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Bailey, Ted Sexton and Phillip Bobo
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenn v. Hulsey et al
as 1:2009cv01390
Plaintiff:
Ted W. Fenn
Defendant:
John B. Hulsey, Jr., Hulsey Environmental Services, Inc. and LHR Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hawkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2009cv00946
Plaintiff:
Ted Wayne Hawkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bishop v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2008cv01661
Plaintiff:
Ted Bishop, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Zimmerman v. Laird et al
as 2:2008cv00633
Plaintiff:
Levanure Zimmerman
Defendant:
R Joel Laird, Jr and Ted Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
