Cases 21 - 30 of 14,483
Johnson v. Keith et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Keith and Julian A. Savannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobb v. Unum Group Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation, Unum Provident Corporation, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cobb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McEntire v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Wanda McEntire
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Durocher v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Catherine A. Durocher
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center, LLC and Brandon Slade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Herrmann et al v. Nata et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Sara Herrmann and Melissa Hera
Defendant:
Jodie Nata, Stephanie Paul, Bernadette Dees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. AAM Equipment LLC
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
James T. Jones
Defendant:
AAM Equipment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Mickles v. Walmart
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
State of Alabama v. Scully
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger and State of Alabama
Defendant:
Defacto Judge William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCuien v. Peters
as 1:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
Elante Javonne McCuien
Respondent:
Ken Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
