Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 556
Janathaen Strum v. Shane Abreo, et al
as 24-11926
Defendant: FREDDIE BLACKMON, COLUMBUS CHIEF OF POLICE, JEFFREY BRIDGES and others
Plaintiff: JANATHAEN STRUM
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodrigues, et al
as 24-11779
Defendant: L. RODRIGUES, JOHN DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3 and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL DUMOND
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. FCI Coleman Low Warden, et al
as 24-11694
Defendant: FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, FNU BELLTON, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer, FNU GALLION, Coleman Low Special Housing Unit Officer, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff: WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Kenneth JohnsonIn re: Kenneth Johnson
as 24-11673
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH JOHNSON
Respondent: GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, VALDOSTA-LOWNDES REGIONAL CRIME LABORATORY and others
Paul Walde v. Sharon Keri, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-11631
Defendant: UNKNOWN PERSON, SHARON KERI, Process Manager and JOHN DOE, UNNAMED DEFENDANT PERSON OF DMV OVER SEE LICENSE SUSPENSION
Plaintiff: PAUL DONOVAN WALDE
Peter Gatlyn v. Sergeant Moore, et al
as 24-11651
Defendant: SERGEANT MOORE and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff: PETER A. GATLYN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11619
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Defendant: JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 3, JANE DOE 4 and others
Unknown: SERVICE
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Defendant: BRIAN J. DAVIS, FNU BERMAN, FNU PHELPS and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
William Adams, et al v. Bordeau Metals Southeast, LLC, et al
as 24-11572
Plaintiff: WILLIAM FRANKLIN ADAMS, TONI MICHELLE ADAMS, AMY LESTER ASTIN and others
Defendant: BORDEAU METALS SOUTHEAST, LLC, BB&K HOLDINGS, LLC, BB&K HOLDINGS TN, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?