Cases 51 - 60 of 561
Andre Sheffield v. Michael Brown, et al
as 23-10698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE LAVON SHEFFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN OFFICIAL NUMBER 2, UNKNOWN OFFICIAL NUMBER 1, UNKNOWN OFFICIAL NUMBER 3 and others
Robert MorganIn re: Robert Morgan
as 23-10713
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shane Villarino, et al v. Pacesetter Personnel Service, Inc., et al
as 23-10645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE VILLARINO, LAURA KAREN JOHNSON, JEFFERY MONDY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE, INC., PACESETTER PERSONNEL SERVICE OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA STAFFING SERVICE, INC. and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Bradley Sanders, et al v. Ajanta Pharma USA, Inc., et al
as 23-10640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY SANDERS, MARSHA SHOW, SHIRLEY BROWE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AJANTA PHARMA USA, INC., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Renardo Lewis, et al v. City Of Marietta, et al
as 23-10614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENARDO NEHEMIAH LEWIS and LUBREEZE LEWIS-FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MARIETTA, DAN FLYNN, ENRIQUE MALLEN and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
USA v. Andre Lewis
as 23-10530
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRE MAURICE LEWIS
USA v. Diante Lewis
as 23-10419
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANTE JARREL LEWIS
Brandon Nix v. Lee Mobley, et al
as 23-10378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON NIX
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MOBLEY and CHARLES LEWIS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Dudley Lewis v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-10153
Petitioner / Appellant:
DUDLEY LEWIS
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
