Cases 81 - 90 of 563
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert MorganIn re: Robert Morgan
as 22-12524
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joshua Franklin v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 22-11945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, JACK CAMPBELL, C. BAILEY and others
Robert MorganIn re: Robert Morgan
as 22-12035
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Frank Chandler v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 21-12618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK CHANDLER, GLENDA TAYLOR, MARINA SPEKTOR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC.
In re: Melvin Lewis, et al
as 22-11796
Petitioner:
In re: MELVIN LEWIS and JUANITA LEWIS
Respondent:
CAREPLUS HEALTH PLANS, INC., ARGUS DENTAL AND VISION, SAGE DENTAL GROUP OF FL, INC. and others
Rodney K., Sr., et al v. Mobile County Board of Education, et al
as 22-11022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY K., SR., MARY K., MARY K., as guardian ad litem for R.K., Jr., Minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MOBILE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DOUGLAS HARWELL, JR., In his official and individual capacity, DON STRINGFELLOW, in his official and individual capacity - District II and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kymell Pak v. Warden, et al
as 22-11080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYMELL PAK
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, JACOB BEASLEY, Deputy Warden Security Officer, Tier II, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JONES, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
