Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Timothy Reeves v. Shay Hatcher, et al
as 24-10063
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, PERRY, FIELDS and others
USA v. Ryan Reeves
as 23-13942
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN LORD REEVES
Kanita Wilburn, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-12630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KANITA M. WILBURN, COLTON BLAKE DAVIS, STEVEN LEE ECKMEYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
3M COMPANY
Shaun Reeves v. 3M Company
as 23-12643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUN MICHAEL REEVES
Defendant / Appellee:
3M COMPANY
Ju Baung, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-11527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JU BAUNG, YONGHEE P. BAUNG, CANDICE L. COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelvin Mitchell v. Sharon Reeves, et al
as 23-10501
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KELVIN MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellant:
SHARON REEVES, CYNTHIA MCDONALD and LULA TYSON-BAILEY
Crandall Postell v. City of Cordele Georgia, et al
as 22-13636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRANDALL POSTELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CORDELE GEORGIA, a Georgia Municipal Corporation, CITY COMMISSION, of the City of Cordele, CHAIRMAN JOHN WIGGINS and others
Mark Hilderbrand v. Sharon Lewis, et al
as 22-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ANDREW HILDERBRAND
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON LEWIS, SHARON BROWN, EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Ronald Veteto v. Roy Hightower, et al
as 22-10475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD D. VETETO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY HIGHTOWER, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, W. G. POWELL, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID STILL, Supervisor, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
