Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
La Potencia, LLC, et al v. David Chandler, et al
as 24-11646
Plaintiff: LA POTENCIA, LLC, Delaware limited liability company and YC52, LLC D/B/A CHANDLER BATS, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Defendant: DAVID CHANDLER, an individual, GROUP AUTHENTIC LLC, a sole proprietorship, MAXBAT, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation and others
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
USA v. Darryl Chandler
as 24-10660
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DARRYL LEE CHANDLER
USA v. David Chandler
as 23-13836
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID RONALD CHANDLER
USA v. Gregory Chandler, Jr.
as 23-12836
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: GREGORY CHANDLER, JR.
In re: Zachary Chandler
as 23-12106
Petitioner: In re: ZACHARY CHANDLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Chandler v. Sheriff, Walton County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-13698
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER CHANDLER
Defendant / Appellee: SHERIFF, WALTON COUNTY
Type: Labor FMLA
USA v. Cameron Chandler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-12620
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CAMERON D. CHANDLER
Frank Chandler v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 21-12618
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANK CHANDLER, GLENDA TAYLOR, MARINA SPEKTOR and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10292
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benjamin Oryang v. Dr. Siddiq, et al
as 22-10076
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant / Appellee: TAHIR DR. SIDDIQ, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DR. OWENS and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?