Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gregory Lane v. Mayor of Eatonville, Florida, et al
as 23-10700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY R. LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF EATONVILLE, FLORIDA, ROBERT L. JONES, WASHINGTON and others
Jeffery Wooden v. The Town of Eatonville, et al
as 22-10649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY WOODEN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TOWN OF EATONVILLE, ROY SMITH, Individually, ROBERT L. JONES, Individually and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 19-11212
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner, STEVE UPTON, Deputy Facilities Director, RICK JACOBS, Facilities Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
In re: Robert Jones
as 17-13339
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEE JONES
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Wheeler Bros., Inc. v. Robert Jones, Jr.
as 17-12686
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WHEELER BROS., INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT L. JONES, JR., VIRGINIA JONES, ROBERT L. JONES, III and others
Wheeler Bros., Inc. v. Virginia Jones, et al
as 17-12691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WHEELER BROS., INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
VIRGINIA JONES, ROBERT L. JONES, III, PIRATES TOW, LLC and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, et al
as 17-11069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RICK JACOBS, Facilities Director and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 15-14286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner, RICK JACOBS, Facilities Director and others
Robert Jones v. Warden
as 15-13623
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
