Cases 1 - 10 of 27
D'Alessandro, III v. Bell et al
as 3:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Dalessandro, III and Joseph L. D'Alessandro, III
Defendant:
John Bell and Sarah Angeles Chad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Alessandro, III v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. D'Alessandro
Defendant:
Christopher Lane, Damauro, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Reed et al
as 5:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Mills and Christopher Durrence Mills
Defendant:
Sarah Reed, A. B. Atkinson, Sumter C.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achille v. Target Corporation et al
as 6:2021cv02063
Plaintiff:
Ridgh Genesis Achille
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Sarah Marie Powell and Jerry Birch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Reed et al
as 5:2021cv00309
Respondent:
Lt. Sarah Reed and Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crespo v. Soule et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Defendant:
FNU Blueming, M. Martin, Mark Pleiss and others
Plaintiff:
David A Crespo, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ritchie v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv01830
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Sarah Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Boatman v. Ute et al
as 2:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Sarah Senter, Jane Doe Morris, Rebecca Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon et al v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Defendant:
K. MCCARTER, L. SWANSON, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Caron Dettmann and Sarah McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Snipes v. Gaddis et al
as 8:2019cv02105
Defendant:
John Mafooda, Richard Kenyon, Sarah Gaddis and others
Plaintiff:
Traymonte Snipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
