Cases 1 - 10 of 1,335
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Defendant:
KEVIN WELLS, BILL EDDINS, TERRY TERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. RHODES
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
CARL TAYLOR, JR
Defendant:
TERRY L RHODES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. WARDEN FRANKLIN CI
as 4:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TERRY SANDERS
Respondent:
WARDEN FRANKLIN CI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
TERRY LEON BUTLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCGUIRE-MOLLICA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WOODS v. COPELAND et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
ASHLEE COPELAND, W SUMMERS and MATTHEW J TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLDRIDGE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2023cv00333
Petitioner:
TERRY L BOLDRIDGE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
TERRY BROWN
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS BUNTON, EMILY BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. SC&D NORTH MONROE LLC
as 4:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
TERRY THOMPSON
Defendant:
SC&D NORTH MONROE LLC dba DUNKIN DONUTS and SC&D NORTH MONROE LLC doing business as DUNKIN DONUTS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
