Cases 1 - 10 of 5,573
v. Impact RTO Florida LLC d/b/a Rent A Center
as 5:2024cv00124
Defendant:
Impact RTO Florida LLC d/b/a Rent A Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
LE BOSS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
RYAN TODD LE BOSS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Derick Levell Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANDERFORD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
PERRY GENE VANDERFORD
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES IRS and INMATE TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. ROESKE et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
N ROESKE and D J LAVERGNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
GIVINS v. D&C FOODS INC
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Chiquitarose Givins
Defendant:
D&C Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COLLIER v. FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
FL BOARD OF EDUCATION BOARD OF GOVERNOR, CHARLES WADE COLLIER and D TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
KNIGHT v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00241
Petitioner:
ARNOLD JEROME KNIGHT
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. CSL CREEKSIDE FL LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
TANYA WHITE
Defendant:
CSL CREEKSIDE FL, LLC d/b/a THE WATERFORD AT CREEKSIDE and SONIDA SENIOR LIVING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
