Cases 21 - 30 of 228
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR
Defendant:
BILL JOHNSON, BOBBY GATES, SR., JUSTIN JAKE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER et al v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN L ALEXANDER and ROGER WALTER STEWART, JR
Defendant:
KILILO KIJAKAZI, JOE BIDEN, AMANDA STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HARRIS v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
DAVID C HARRIS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. FOSTER, et al.
as 4:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
DAVID T JOHNSON
Defendant:
URVASHI FOSTER, BILLIE JOE FOSTER, Deputy BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC doing business as GAME-ON SPORTS CAFE and JAMES W DEBONA
BEY v. BIDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
MAHALA ZOELLE BEY and KIESHA ANN JONES
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRIS CARR, DAVID ERTEL and others
TROUPE v. LOWE et al
as 5:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
JAMES OLIVER TROUPE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BRENT LOWE, JACKSON DEFORE, RAYMOND DICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
