Cases 71 - 80 of 26,352
BANKS et al v. BOSWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JALEN BANKS and DONAVAN SANFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS BOSWELL, BOSWELL FARMS ENTERPRISES LLC, BOSWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
YEHOWSHUA I TURNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHURCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Debra Church
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
