Cases 81 - 90 of 1,049
Rodney Kralovetz v. Marion Spearman, et al
as 20-15437
Defendant / Appellee:
P. COX, MARION SPEARMAN, Warden, NARANJA, Lt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY T. KRALOVETZ
(PC) Currie v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Ralph Diaz, Andrew Altevogt and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Brown
as 20-1520
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX PADILLIA, SCOTT KERNAN, MICHAEL COHEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS
(PC) Percival v. Kernan, et al.
as 1:2020cv00297
Defendant:
E. Stark, C. Brubaker, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Percival
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Torres v. Scott Kernan
as 20-15303
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO TORRES
(PC) Irwine v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00420
Defendant:
Joe Lizarraga, Jerry Brown, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Irwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Singleton v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-55174
Defendant / Appellee:
G. HERNANDEZ, Lieutenant (Inv. Serv. Unit), SCOTT KERNAN, N. BEDUHI, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN X. SINGLETON, AKA Kelvin Lewis Singleton
Derrick Johnson v. Superior Court of the State, et al
as 20-15231
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSOCIATIONS and SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR KINGS COUNTY
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK LYNN JOHNSON, AKA Derrick L. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Haygood v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Diana Toche, Ralph M. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Haygood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
