Cases 11 - 20 of 33
McElroy v. Gwinnett Municipality et al
as 1:2022cv04455
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Gwinnett Municipality, Superior Court Judge Beyeres Office Staff, Chris Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hare et al v. McElroy et al
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Yamil Hare, Jose Sosa and Yamil Alexsander Hare
Defendant:
Stacy McElroy, Sheriff Huey Mack, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swanson v. Cobb County Department of Family and Children Services et al
as 1:2021cv04978
Plaintiff:
Heather Swanson
Defendant:
Cobb County Department of Family and Children Services, Cobb County Police Department, Safepath Children Advocacy Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. McElroy et al
as 2:2018cv01377
Defendant:
Alameda County, Jefferson County, Alabama, Elizabeth W. McElroy and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Gregory Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Savannah Technical College et al
as 4:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Todd McElroy
Defendant:
Savannah Technical College and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Savannah Technical College
as 4:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Todd McElroy
Defendant:
Savannah Technical College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
