Cases 11 - 20 of 17,467
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
South v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Cheri Pilkington, Christy Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
John Bradley White
Defendant:
Cheri Pilkington, Christie Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
