Cases 1 - 10 of 1,531
United States of America v. Zastrow et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Calvin Zastrow, Kenneth Tyler Scott, Chester Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Scott v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Celesta Scott
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety, Lt. Charles Chapeau, TFC David Kraeling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JACKSON et al v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60935
Plaintiff:
JAYANNA JACKSON, Scott Ross and MIKE GABELUS
Defendant:
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A Florida Municipality,, Rick maglione, Steve GREENLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott Dubose v. Amazon
as 24-11207
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL DUBOSE
Defendant:
AMAZON and AMAZON.COM, INC.
SCOTT v. KEARNEY et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
VICENT L SCOTT
Defendant:
RICK KEARNEY and SONYA A WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
