Cases 51 - 60 of 1,022
HAWKINS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REDWINE, SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buckman v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Buckman
Defendant:
A. Hill and Sherri C. Hoilman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLS v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JESSICA HILLS
Respondent:
PISTRO, WINGFIELD, BOOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. USA
as 5:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
EVERETTE HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. Flannagan et al
as 2:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Regan C Thomas and Regan C. Thomas
Defendant:
Robert A Flannagan, Austin C. Brown, M Durton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Welcher et al
as 4:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Martin
Defendant:
Sheriff John Welcher, Lt. Mauras, Sgt. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENORE v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
NATHAN PATRICK BENORE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS, SERGEANT THOMPSON, SERGEANT PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCREYNOLDS v. LYLES et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
BLAKE AUSTIN MCREYNOLDS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER J LYLES, SERGEANT D COURTOT, NURSE JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ducan et al
as 3:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Defendant:
E. Ducan, E. Hardin, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
DUSHUN D ROBINSON
Defendant:
HILL, JANE OR JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
