Cases 1 - 10 of 1,547
Bentzel v. Lam et al
as 5:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
George F Bentzel
Defendant:
FNU Lam, FNU Deal, FNU Fergueson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Brewster, III v. Arthur Smith
as 24-11763
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
ARTHUR L. SMITH, Superior Court of Muscogee County
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv21975
Plaintiff:
George J. Sebastian III
Defendant:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pharr v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey George Pharr
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans, Anthony G. v. Petrolia et al
as 9:2024cv80625
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Evans
Defendant:
Shelly Petrolia, Anthony Perez, Russ Mager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Landreth v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Landreth
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and George LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
