Cases 141 - 150 of 840,921
Meyers v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Jack F. Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bassett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01600
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bassett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Jones v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2024cv04969
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
Bryant Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WALLER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04971
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
HANNAH RUTH WALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JORDAN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04972
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
AUBREY JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSULLIVAN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04973
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
ERIKA SALES OSULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLEMAN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04974
Plaintiff:
GENEVA F. COLEMAN
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PATTERSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04978
Plaintiff:
CHERALENE PATTERSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAGG v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04985
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
RAY BRAGG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
