Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Chmura v. Galen et al
as 8:2015cv01943
Plaintiff:
Linda Lan Chmura
Defendant:
Phyllis Galen, Kimberly Bonner, Rick DeFuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02734
Plaintiff:
John Holmes
Defendant:
Benefield, Tracy G. Lawson, Renee Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. DUNCAN
as 3:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
TOLAND JEROME BONNER
Defendant:
J SCOTT DUNCAN and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicely v. Couch et al
as 2:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nicely
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Jeremy Prickett, William Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kallas v. Yoder et al
as 9:2013cv80979
Plaintiff:
Angelo B Kallas
Defendant:
Scott Yoder , Derek Harrison , Seth Perrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 3:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
LOUIS CARTER
Defendant:
VETERANS AFFAIRS, ANNE BRYANT, JO BONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarria Horsley v. University of Alabama, et al
as 13-13279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARRIA MICHELLE HORSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, DONNA MEESTER and others
Horsley v. University of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tarria Michelle Horsley
Defendant:
University of Alabama, The, Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, Richard Stephen Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Woodard v. City of Senoia, Georgia et al
as 3:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Bonner Woodard, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Senoia, Georgia , Zachary Heinberg and John Does 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCarley v. City of Roanoke et al (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
George D. McCarley
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Penny Holloway, Ellen Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
