Cases 21 - 30 of 2,245
East v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy et al
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Billy Flint East
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Donna Conyers Yeatman, James S Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WESLEY v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shaquada Wesley
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY, CHIP SIMMONS, Martin J Klee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Bianca Reaves and Kathy R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, Cedric Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc. and Host Katisha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Will Ainsworth, House Speaker Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry Freeze v. R. Larizza, et al
as 24-11212
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE FREEZE
Defendant:
R. J. LARIZZA and SHERIFF OF PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA
Caryn Yost-Rudge, et al v. The City of Stuart, et al
as 24-11481
Plaintiff:
CARYN HALL YOST-RUDGE and WILLIAM JOHN RUDGE, IV
Defendant:
THE CITY OF STUART, A TO Z PROPERTIES, INC, PAUL J. NICOLETTI and others
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Cody Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
