Cases 361 - 370 of 36,852
Johnson v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Defendant:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric J. Young and Michael H. Hurwitz
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Gadson et al
as 4:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Ephan Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Burns, Roderick Gadson, Jr. and Jajuan Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sumter County et al
as 5:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Conquajhia Harris
Defendant:
Sumter County, Deputy Michael Voss and Sheriff William Farmer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denhardt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Eddie Denhardt
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Majeroni v. Chatham County Board of Elections et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Defendant:
Andrew Nizwantowski, Robert Santoro, Chatham County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Majeroni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Maurice Carr
Defendant:
Leontyne Daniel and Reginald B. Scandrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
HIGH SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
AMBER MARIE CLARK
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY'S FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00412
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY'S FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
AMBER MARIE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
