Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Fatuma Robertson
Defendant:
Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Nails v. St Joesph's /Chandler et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
St Joesph's /Chandler, Karen Turner and Dajaunia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendall v. Chandler Residential
as 1:2023cv03965
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Kendall
Defendant:
Chandler Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KHAN, M.D. v. Stephen et al
as 9:2023cv80702
Plaintiff:
DR SAEED AKHTAR KHAN and SAEED AKHTAR KHAN, M.D.
Defendant:
Noel E. Stephen, JAVIER A. GONZALEZ, TERESA CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MCLEOD v. MALPHUS
as 1:2022cv00132
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BECKY MALPHUS, BECKEY MALPHUS, CHANDLER GIDDES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Villars v. Michael et al
as 1:2022cv21475
Plaintiff:
Janvier Villars
Defendant:
Shaul Michael, Walter Restrepo, Norma Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. SCOTT
as 4:2021cv00265
Defendant:
DR EDWARD SCOTT
Plaintiff:
PAUL CHANDLER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossin et al v. Clinch et al
as 3:2021cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tony Rossin, Eric Chandler, Hakim Abdullah and others
Defendant:
Sgt. L. Clinch and The City of Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
